C. VISWANATH, SUBHASH CHANDRA
New India Assurance Co. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
State Bank of India – Respondent
ORDER
Subhash Chandra, Member—This revision petition under section 21 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (in short, the ‘Act’) assails order dated 16.10.2019 of the Karnataka State Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission, Bangalore (in short, ‘State Commission’) dismissing Appeal No. 2204 of 2011 filed against order dated 17.03.2012.
2. The State Commission has held that:—
“The appeal is hereby partly allowed with cost of Rs.5,000/-.
The impugned order passed by the 3rd Additional District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Bangalore in CC no. 1725 of 2010 dated 24.06.2011 is hereby modified as follows:
The complaint is allowed directing
the insurance company to settle the
claim of the loan amount to the extent of Rs.10,06,842.76 with interest up to 06.03.2007 to the appellant bank within three months from the date of this
order.
Similarly, the appellant/ OP – 2 is directed to refund a sum of Rs.2,95,000/- to the complainant/ respondent no.1 within 30 days from the date of this order. Failing which, it shall carry an interest at the rate of 12% per annum from the date of default, till actual payment.
The complainant is also entitled to a compensation of Rs.50,000/- and a c
Lourdes Society Snehanjali Girls Hostel and Ors. vs. H & R Johnson (India) Ltd. and Ors.
Revisional jurisdiction - where two interpretations of evidence are possible, concurrent findings based on evidence have to be accepted and such findings cannot be substituted in revisional jurisdict....
(1) Concurrent findings – In the present case there are concurrent findings of facts and thus revisional jurisdiction of this Commission is limited.(2) Revisional jurisdiction – In exercising of revi....
“Execution proceedings” - Execution proceedings under section 25(3) or section 27(1) of the Act 1986 are distinctively different from adjudication of a ‘consumer dispute’, they are separate independe....
Revision under Section 21(b) of Act, 1986 confers very limited jurisdiction on National Commission.
(1) Review – The power of National Commission to review under Section 21 of the Act is therefore, limited to cases where some prima facie error appears in the impugned order.(2) Error – It is evident....
(1) Limited Scope of Revisional Jurisdiction – The NCDRC, under Section 21(b) of the 1986 Act (pari materia to Section 58(1)(b) of the 2019 Act), cannot act as a second court of appeal. It cannot int....
Evidence - Where two interpretation of evidence are possible, concurrent findings based on evidence have to be accepted and such findings cannot be substituted in revisional jurisdiction.
Group Insurance Policy – Insured shall be entitled to amount insured under policies for which amount of premium was already paid prior to death of insured.
(1) National Commission - National Commission in exercise of its revisional jurisdiction Commission is not required to re-assess and re-appreciate the evidence on record.(2) National Commission - Nat....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.