SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

SUBHASH CHANDRA
Life Insurance Corporation of India – Appellant
Versus
Bhajno – Respondent


Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioners:Mr. Lakshay Sawhney and Mr. Naaz Ahmed, Advocates
For the Respondent: Ex-parte

ORDER

Subhash Chandra, Presiding Member—This revision petition filed under section 21(b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (in short, the ‘Act’) assails the order of the State Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission, Punjab (in short, ‘State Commission’) in First Appeal No. 582 of 2018 dated 10.05.2017 dismissing the appeal against the order of the District Forum, Ropar (in short, ‘District Forum’) dated 28.04.2015. The said order directs the petitioner to pay the respondent Rs 2,00,000/- each under two policies along with 9% interest on these sums till realization apart from Rs 3000/- as compensation and Rs 2000/- as cost of litigation on account of the death of the respondent’s husband who was a policy holder of the two life policies.

2. The brief facts of the case are that on 27.03.2006, the petitioner’s husband Faqir Chand purchased a life insurance policy (No. 163096217) from the respondent for a sum of Rs 50,000/-. Subsequently, on 08.12.2010 and 29.10.2010 purchased two more policies under the respondent’s Jeevan Saral scheme (Nos. 164558088 and 164558264 respectively) for Rs 2,00,000/- each and paid the requisite premium regularly. On 21.05.2012 the respondent informed the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top