SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

RAJAN SHARMA, BIMLA KUMARI
Sanjay Kr. Gupta – Appellant
Versus
Parsvnath Developers Ltd. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Complainant:Mr. Mukesh Gahlot, Advocate
For the Opp. Party:Mr. Aishwary Jain, Advocate
For the Opp. Party: None

ORDER

Bimla Kumari, Member (Female)—Brief facts of the case, which led the complainants to file the present complaint are that they had booked a residential Flat no. 501, T-11 on 22.10.2013 in the project of opposite party namely “Parsvnath Privilege’ which was to be developed and constructed at Plot no.11, Sector P-1, Greater Noida, UP vide Application/Booking Form (Annexure-C1). At the time of booking of the flat, the opposite party had verbally assured the complainant that the construction of the flat was in full swing and possession of the flat would be handed over to the complainants by December 2015. It is the case of the complainants that at the time of booking of the flat, the opposite party gave only the Application/Booking Form to them, which contained only few terms, which were meant to lure the buyers to purchase/book the flat in the project and Buyers Agreement was never showed to them. The Buyers Agreement was given to the complainants after a delay of about 3 months from the date of booking of the flat and that too for obtaining the signatures of the complainants, at the blank space available on each page. Many of the clauses of the Buyers agreement were one sided an

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top