SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

R.K.AGRAWAL, S.M.KANTIKAR
Rajesh Kumar Sah – Appellant
Versus
Managing Director, Kores India Ltd. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Jay Kishore Singh, Advocate
For the Respondent:Ms. Deepa Chacko, Advocate

ORDER

Challenge in this Revision Petition is to the Order dated 08.02.2008 passed by the Bihar State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission at Patna (hereinafter referred to as ‘the State Commission’) in First Appeal No.582 / 2006, whereby the State Commission allowed the Appeal filed by the Kores (India) Limited (hereinafter referred to as the Respondent Company) by setting aside the Order dated 22.06.2006 passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Bhagalpur (hereinafter referred to as ‘the District Forum’) by which the District Forum had allowed the Complaint.

2. The Revision Petition pertains to the year 2008. The Revision Petition was dismissed in default on 05.04.2017. M.A. No. 168 of 2017 for restoration was filed. The Revision Petition was restored to its original number vide Order dated 15.06.2017.

3. Concisely narrated, the facts leading to the filing of the Complaint are that the Rajesh Kumar Sah (hereinafter referred to as the Complainant), being an unemployed youth, applied for loan from the State Bank of India, Bhagalpur in 1996 for installation of Automatic Plain Paper Copier (in short, the photocopier machine) under the “Prime Minister Rojgar Yojna”. A

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top