SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

S. M. KANTIKAR
Suresh Chandra Parakh – Appellant
Versus
Naresh Trehan – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Complainant: In person (Through Video Conferencing)
For the Opp. Parties:Mr. Joy Basu, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Shyel Trehan, Advocate, Mr. Kanak Bose, Advocate, Mr. Rohan Poddar, Advocate

ORDER

The Present Complaint has been filed under section 21 (a) (i) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (for short “the Act”) by Suresh Chandra Parekh (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Complainant’) against Dr. Naresh Trehan & Medanta, The Medicity (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Opposite Parties’) seeking compensation to the tune of Rs. 2,25,68,000/-

2. On 31.03.2014 The Complainant Suresh Chandra Parekh, aged 74 years visited Medanta Hospital (OP-2) with problems of Angina & heaviness in chest. He was admitted on next day i.e. 01.04.2014 and Coronary Angiography (CAG) was done. It revealed “Native Triple Vessel Disease (TVD)” consisting of LAD having 100% Blockage, LCX as Dominant vessel having Two Blockages-80 % & 50%. Thereafter, Dr. Trehan (OP-1) advised the Complainant for “Bypass Surgery” and told that he would perform the surgery. Accordingly, on 07.04.2014 surgery was performed by OP-1. It was alleged that only one blockage (LAD) was By-passed and the remaining two blockages (LCX) were left untouched. It was further alleged that OP-1 never informed the Complainant about

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top