SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

R. K. AGRAWAL, S. M. KANTIKAR, BINOY KUMAR
Nishi Patni – Appellant
Versus
Emaar Mgf Land Limited – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Complainant:Mr. Deepak Aggarwal, Advocate
For the Opp. Party:Mr. Shashank Sharma, Advocate

ORDER

The present Consumer Complaint has been filed under Section 12(1)(a) read with Section 21 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (for short “the Act”) by Dr. Nidhi Patni and Dr. Sanjeev Kumar Patni (hereinafter referred to as the Complainants) against Opposite Party, M/s. Emaar MGF Land Limited (hereinafter referred to as the Developer), seeking refund of the amount paid towards purchase of Flat alongwith interest, compensation and costs as the Opposite Party Developer failed to hand-over the possession of the Apartment booked by them in the Project launched by the Developer in the name and style of “Palm Gardens” located at Sector-83, Gurgaon, Haryana.

2. Brief facts of the case as narrated in the Complaint are that the Opposite Party Developer launched a Residential Project in the name and style of “Palm Gardens” located at Sector-83, Gurgaon, Haryana (hereinafter referred to as the Project). The Complainants booked an Apartment for residential purpose in the said Project for a total sale consideration of Rs.1,00,45,319/- in late 2011. Unit bearing No. PGN-09-12A03 at 12th Floor, Tower No. 09 having super area of approx. 1900 sq. ft. was provisionally allotted to the Complainan

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top