SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

SHYAMAL KUMAR GHOSH, SUBHRA SANKAR BHATTA
Ratna Bhaumik – Appellant
Versus
Millennium India Construction – Respondent


Counsel for the Parties:
For the Complainants:Ms. Sanhita Shaoo, Ms. Karabi Mukherjee, Advocates

ORDER

Shyamal Kumar Ghosh, Presiding Member—The instant consumer case has been filed against the opposite parties praying for refund of money along with interest or alternatively praying for handing over the possession of the flat by means of execution and registration of the deed of conveyance in favour of the complainants as per agreement dated 02/02/2018, compensation, costs etc.

2. The factual matrix of the case is that one Santanu Bhaumik and Tapas Kumar Bhaumik both have intended to purchase a flat from the opposite parties/developers and they have entered into an agreement for sale dated 13/02/2014 with the developers in respect of purchase of one self contained flat on the 6th floor, Block – ‘A’ measuring area 1500 sft along with car parking space on the ground floor measuring area 100 sft for a total consideration amount of Rs.61,00,000/- and out of which Rs.26,50,000/- has already been paid on or before signing the said agreement for sale.

3. That on 02/02/2018 another agreement for sale has been executed by and between the developers and the complainants for purchasing one self contained flat on the 4th floor , Block – ‘B’ measuring area 1150 sft along with car parking s

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top