SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

RAJAN SHARMA, BIMLA KUMARI
V. K. Jain – Appellant
Versus
Parsvnath Buildwell Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Complainant:Mr. Kapil Jain, Advocate
For the Opp. Party:Ms. Deepshikha, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Rajan Sharma, Member (Judicial)—Briefly the facts of the case are that initially the complaint was filed before the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum-IV, (North-East District), Nand Nagri, Delhi-110093 in 2013 but the complaint was returned due to pecuniary jurisdiction. Thereafter, the Complainant has filed this complaint on 27.08.2018 before this Commission alleging deficiency of service and unfair trade practice on the part of Opposite Party and has prayed the following reliefs:—

(a) “Direct the Opposite Party to refund the amount of 10,73,280/-(Rupees Ten Lacs Seventy Three Thousand Two Hundred Eighty only) pad by the complainant towards the purchase of Residential Flat along with interest @ 24% per annum from the date of payment till realization to the complainant.

(b) Direct the Opposite Party to pay compensation to the tune of Rs.1,00,000/- to the complainant for mental pain and agony being suffered by the complainant at the hands of the Opposite Party;

(c) Allow the litigation charges of Rs.25,000/- in favour of the complainant and against the Opposite Party;

(d) Pass any other or further order(s) which this Hon’ble Forum may deem fit and proper in

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top