JUDGMENT

Sangita Dhingra Sehgal, President—The present Consumer Complaint was initially filed before the District Commission on 28.01.2015. However, the Complainants withdrew their complaint on the ground of pecuniary jurisdiction with a liberty to file it before appropriate Commission. Therefore, vide order dated 24.08.2018, the District Commission dismissed the complaint as withdrawn with a liberty to file it before appropriate Commission. Thereafter, the present complaint was re-filed before this Commission under Section 17 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, by the Complainants alleging deficiency in service and Unfair Trade Practice on the part of Opposite Parties and has prayed the following reliefs:—

(a) “Hold the Opposite Party no. 1-4, guilty of deficiency of service and unfair trade practice.

(b) Direct Opposite Party No. 1-2 to the refund the entire monies amounting to Rs. 4,50,000/- deposited by the Complainants together with 18% interest from the date of deposit of the same till the date of realization.

(c) Grant the Complainants, compensation of Rs. 2,00,000/- as compensation for the mental harassment and agony suffered over the uncertainty of their dream place of