Back
RAVISHANKAR, SUNITA CHANNABASAPPA BAGEWADI
Hubli Electricity Supply Company – Appellant
Versus
Santhosh Peetambar Pandel – Respondent
ORDER
Smt. Sunita Channabasappa Bagewadi, Member—This appeal is filed by the appellants/Opposite parties being aggrieved by the Order dated 22.03.2014 passed in CC.No.66/2012 on the file of District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Uttar Kannada at Karwar and prays to set-aside the order and to allow the appeal in the interest of justice and equity.
2. The brief facts of the case are as under:
That the complainant had established an ice manufacturing plant for his self employment to earn his livelihood and he had obtained electricity connection bearing meter no.CHMP-7 on 28.11.1996 under type Rt-5. Since he had suffered heavy loss he could not pay the electricity bill within time and as such he was due in a sum of Rs.2,18,777/- as on 04.01.2002. This bill is inclusive of the consumption charges, fixed charges and arrears. He could not pay the said amount because of financial crisis. Therefore the OP has disconnection the electricity connection on 12.01.2002 and thereafter it was not reconnected. The OP has adjusted security deposit of Rs.1,02,774/- as against the outstanding dues. The balance amount payable by the complainant was Rs.1,15,503/-. But the OP has issued a demand n
Commercial Purpose - The Ice manufacturing plant run by the Respondent with Electricity taken that the appellant company is not being used for domestic purpose it is being used for industrial purpose....
Electricity bill dispute—Consumer Forum cannot quash bill without giving any definite findings on whether demand made by Company was wrong.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
