RAM SURAT RAM MAURYA, INDER JIT SINGH
Shekhar Sethu – Appellant
Versus
EMAAR MGF Land Limited – Respondent
ORDER
Heard Mr. Shushil Kaushik, Advocate, for the complainants, Mr. Sunil Mund, Advocate, for opposite parties-1 & 2 and Mr. Pragalbh Bhardwaj, Advocate, for opposite party-3.
2. Shekhar Shethu and Smrita Jain have filed above complaint, for directing the opposite parties to (i) handover possession of apartment No. TDP-F-F06-602, complete in all respect as per specification and execute conveyance deed in favour of the complainants; (ii) pay compensation for delayed possession in the form of interest @12% per annum on the deposit of the complainants from due date of possession till handing over possession, (iii) exempt the complainants from paying the escalation in cost including enhanced service tax, (iv) pay Rs.5/- lacs, as compensation for mental agony and harassment and litigation cost; and (v) any other relief which is deemed fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.
3. The complainants stated that the opposite parties were companies, registered under the Companies Act, 1956 and engaged in the business of development and construction of group housing projects and selling its unit to the prospective buyers. Opposite parties-2 and 3 were owners of approximately
Lilavati KirtilaL Mehta Medical Trust vs. Unique Shanti Developers
Wing Commander Arifur Rahman Khan vs. DLF Southern Homes Pvt. Ltd.
DLF Home Developers Limited vs. Capital Greens Flat Buyers Association (2021) 5 SCC 537.(Para 9)
DLF Homes Panchkula Pvt. Ltd. vs. D.S. Dhanda
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.