SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HULUVADI G RAMESH, K. B. SANGANNANAVAR, M. DIVYASHREE
V. N. Lakshminarayana – Appellant
Versus
K. B. Dyavegowda – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant:Sri. Vijaykumar T., Advocate

ORDER

K.B. Sangannanavar, Pri. Dist & Session Judge (R) - Judicial Member—This is an appeal filed U/s.73 of CPA 2019 by Jdr/Appellant aggrieved by the order dtd.19.08.2023 passed in EA/36/2022 on the file of Hassan District Commission. (The parties in this appeal will be referred to as their rank assigned by the Commission below in EA/36/2022).

2. The matter is placed before the commission for hearing on admission. The Commission heard the learned counsel for Appellant/Jdr and perused the impugned order, grounds of appeal and appeal papers.

3. Learned counsel for Jdr submits that the Commission below failed to appreciate provisions of Karnataka Protection of Interest of Depositors in Financial Establishments Act, 2004 (KPIDFE) and failed to appreciate the fact that Mr.V.N.Lakshminarayan, was not a arrayed as a party by name in CC/80/2016 on the file of Hassan District Commission. He further submits that properties of Hindustan Infracon (India) Ltd., i.e. Jdr is already attached under KPIDFE Act 2004 and to that affect CCH 92 Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru on 30.10.2021 in Misc.No.615/2019 allowed the petition filed U/s.5(2) R/w Sec.11(1) of KPIDFE Act 2004 and

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top