SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

SUBHASH CHANDRA, J. RAJENDRA
Chief Administrator, GMADA – Appellant
Versus
Sandeep Bansal – Respondent


Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellants:Ms. Zehra Khan, Advocate
For the Respondents:Mr. Munish Kumar Garg and Mr. Tanuj Goyal, Advocates

ORDER

AVM J. Rajendra, AVSM, VSM (Retd.), Member— This First Appeal, under Section 51 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) has been filed by the Greater Mohali Area Development Authority (hereinafter referred as “GMADA”) and its Estate Officer, against the Order dated 14.02.2020 passed by the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Punjab, Chandigarh (hereinafter to be referred to as “the State Commission”) in Consumer Complaint No. 718 of 2019, wherein the Complaint filed by the Complainants (Respondents herein) was partly allowed.

2. As per report of the Registry, there is a delay of 382 days in filing the present Appeal. The impugned order was passed by the State Commission on 14.02.2020 and received by the Appellants on 25.02.2020. While the prescribed period for filing the Appeal is 30 days, the present Appeal was filed on 12.04.2021. in terms of the Order of Hon’ble Supreme Court in Suo Motu Writ Petition (Civil) No. 3 of 2020 in re: Cognizance for Extension of Limitation the present Appeal filed during the suspended period of limitation be treated having been filed within limitation. The delay in the filing the matter has accordin

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top