SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

INDER JIT SINGH
Punjab Urban Planning & Development Authority – Appellant
Versus
Joginder Singh – Respondent


Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Shubham Bhalla, Ms. Akasnha Gulati and Ms. Ragini Sharma, Advocates
For the Respondent: In Person

ORDER

The present Revision Petition (RP) has been filed by the Petitioner against Respondent as detailed above, under section 21(b) of Consumer Protection Act 1986, against the order dated 28.05.2018 of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Punjab, Chandigarh, (hereinafter referred to as the ‘State Commission’), in First Appeal (FA) No.256 of 2018 in which order dated 23.12.2016 of District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Gurdaspur (hereinafter referred to as District Forum) in Consumer Complaint (CC) No.30 of 2016 was challenged, inter alia praying to set aside the order dated 28.05.2018 passed by the State Commission, Punjab.

2. While the Revision Petitioner (hereinafter also referred to as OP) was Appellant and the Respondent (hereinafter also referred to as Complainant) was Respondent in the said FA/256/2018 before the State Commission, the Revision Petitioner was OP and Respondent was Complainant before the District Commission in the CC no. 30 of 2016. Notice was issued to the Respondent(s) on 09.04.2019. Parties filed Written Arguments/Synopsis on 30.11.2022 (Petitioner) and 02.03.2020 (Respondents) respectively. For the sake of convenience, parties will also b

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top