NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
A.P. Sahi, President and Dr. Sadhna Shanker, Member
Baby Palak Khan and Ors. – Complainant
versus
Amit Upadhyay and Ors. – Opp. Party
Consumer Case No.1074 of 2016
Decided on 25.9.2023
Consumer Protection Act, 1986 – Section 21(1)(a)(i)[Consumer Protection Act, 2019 – Section 58(1)(a)(i)] – Services – medical Negligence – not made out - The complaint very neatly does not dispute the handing over of the Discharge Slip to Aftab Khan which has been stated by Dr. R in the inquiry proceedings before the District Magistrate. This also clearly indicates that the Complainants without having been able to dislodge the endorsement on the Discharge Slip, which is the main bone of contention, kept on raising complaints and as a matter of fact any challenge to the endorsement does not appear to have been made in any of the complaints in spite of having knowledge of the same – Also, on an overall conspectus of the emerging facts the position that can be deduced is that no criminal negligence was established against Opposite Party No.1 – On facts, Complainants having failed to establish any negligence on the part of the Opposite Party No.1 on the standards – Compliant dismissed. [Paras 5 to 33].
Result: Complaint dismissed.
ORDER
A.P. Sahi, President—The violation of the Hippocratic oath, allegations of gross negligence and omission to take ordinary routine care of a new-born child are the issues raised in this complaint by the child Palak, through her parents Aftab Khan (father) and Mrs. Nazrana (since deceased). The grievance is that immediately upon her birth on 3.7.2015 at Tarachand Hospital Hapur, which was a premature delivery, the child having certain respiratory distress was shifted to Lala Lajpat Rai Memorial College Hospital, Meerut Uttar Pradesh. She was treated at the Neo-natal unit of the Paedeatric Department which according to the complainants was negligent care as a result whereof she ultimately lost her eyesight.
2. Complaints were filed and the matter was contested at several Forums alleging that the Opposite Parties herein more particularly the Respondent No.1 and his assistant Respondent No.2 were responsible for gross negligence at the initial stage of the treatment and subsequently, the third Respondent also did not provide the requisite treatment and care that ultimately resulted in the loss of sight of the baby girl. Consequently, a claim based on negligence and deficiency in service for Rs.1.50 crores as compensation to the child and Rs.40 lakhs to the parents with an additional sum of expenses to the tune of Rs.2.5 lakhs coupled with Rs.2 lakhs towards litigation expenses has been raised.
3. The background of the litigation commences with allegations about the negligent attitude more particularly of the Respondent No.1 Dr. Amit Upadhyay who is stated to have nowhere taken any care for referring the child for Retinopathy or premature screening which is a mandatory test to be conducted within the first 3 weeks of the birth of a premature child. It is alleged that neither any effort was made to observe the minimum protocol that is needed in such cases nor were the Complainants informed of any such complication in the child at the opportune moment. The negligence is alleged to be about proper medical advice and taking due care for managing the aforesaid deficiency that could have been located at the initial stage had the Opposite Party No.1 and his team as well as the LLRM Hospital been vigilant.
4. The birth of the child took place on 3.7.2015 from where she was shifted to the LLR Medical College at Meerut and after spending almost 19 days, she was discharged on 21.07.2015. A discharge slip was issued on 22.07.2015.
5. Almost a month thereafter the child developed fever, vomiting and symptoms of loose motion when she was again admitted on 21.08.2015 in the Pediatrics Department and was discharged on 31.08.2015.
6. She is stated to again have developed certain complications and was admitted to the hospital a third time on 17.11.2015. During this period, the deficiency in the eyesight of the child was further diagnosed and was referred to Sardar Vallabh Bhai Eye Hospital under the treatment of one Dr. Jaishree Dwivedi. According to the contentions raised, the child was administered eye drops on her advice for 2-3 days where after she was examined by Dr. Sandeep Mittal of the Ophthalmology Department who on 30.11.2015 opined that ROP stage IV and III had developed. On this, the Complainants state that they rushed to the All India Institute of Medical Sciences where on 2.12.2015, they were informed that it will not be possible to retrieve the eyesight of the child. Having felt hopeless about the recovery of the child, her mother Smt. Nazrana, who was the Complainant No.3 originally in this complaint, gave a written complaint to the Principal of the College on 8.12.2015. A complaint was also made to the Medical Council on 4.1.2016 levelling allegations of gross negligence particularly against the first Respondent and also against the Hospital in general.
7. According to the Complainant on the complaint before the Principal, a Committee was constituted for investigation comprising of three Doctors who opined that the Pediatric De
V. Krishna Kumar vs. State of Tamil Nadu and Ors.
Dr. Laxman Balkrishna Joshi vs. Dr. Trimbak Bapu Godbole and Anr.
Achutrao Haribhau Khodwa and Ors. vs. State of Maharashtra and Ors.
Smt. Rekha Gupta vs. Bombay Hospital Trust and Anr.
Savita Garg vs. Director, National Heart Institute
Indian Medical Association vs. V.P. Shantha
Spring Meadows Hospital and Anr. vs. Harjol Ahluwalia and Anr.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for sufficient medical evidence to establish medical negligence and the duty of care owed by medical professionals to their patient....
(1) Non Supply of Medical Records – deficiency in service by the Opposite Parties is glaringly apparent with regard to non-supply of copies of the medical records, as sought for by the complainants.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.