Sabita Shaw VS Axis Bank

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

DIPA SEN (MAITY), SUBHRA SANKAR BHATTA
Sabita Shaw – Appellant
Versus
Axis Bank – Respondent

Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant:Mr. S.S. Ghosh, Advocate
For the Respondent:Ms. Soni Ojha, Advocate
For the Respondent:Ms. Gargi Chakraborty, Advocate

ORDER

Subhra Sankar Bhatta, Judicial Member—This appeal has been preferred at the instance of the Appellant viz. Sabita Shaw who was the original Complainant before the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Kolkata Unit-II (Central) (hereinafter referred to as ‘the District Commission’ for short) assailing the impugned order dated 29.10.2021 vide order no. 3 passed by the District Commission in connection with consumer Complaint Case no. CC/332/2021 whereby Ld. District Commission was pleased to dispose of the Miscellaneous Application no. 372/2021 being not tenable. The impugned order runs as follows:—

“In view of the above discussion, we refused to grant permission to file the instant consumer complaint to this Commission and complaint should be filed at a place where the cause of action has arisen.

Thus, Miscellaneous Application being no. 372/2021 is disposed of.

In view of forgoing observation, Complai-nant’s application dated 06.09.2021 under Section 38(8) of the C.P. Act, 2019 is not tenable. Thus, MA being no. 372/2021 is disposed of.

Order be uploaded on www.confonet. nic.in.”

2. Feeling aggrieved by and dissatisfied with the above order of the Ld. Commis

Click Here to Read the rest of this document