United India Insurance Company Ltd. VS Neeraj Sharma

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

INDER SINGH MEHTA, R. K. VERMA
United India Insurance Company Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Neeraj Sharma – Respondent

Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
In First Appeal No.280/2018
For the Appellant:Mr. P.S. Chandel, Advocate
For the Respondent No.1:Mr. Govind Korla, Advocate
For the Respondent No.2:Ms. Vandana Thakur, Advocate vice Mr. Surinder Saklani, Advocate
For the Respondent No.3:Ms. Neelam Kaplas, Advocate
For the Respondent No.4:Mr. Shashi Bhushan, Advocate vice Mr. Amit Singh Kanwar, Advocate
In First Appeal No.330/2018
For the Appellant:Ms. Vandana Thakur, Advocate vice Mr. Surinder Saklani, Advocate
For the Respondent No.1:Mr. Govind Korla, Advocate
For the Respondent No.2:Mr. P.S. Chandel, Advocate
For the Respondent No.3:Ms. Neelam Kaplas, Advocate
For the Respondent No.4:Mr. Shashi Bhushan, Advocate vice Mr. Amit Singh Kanwar, Advocate

ORDER

Inder Singh Mehta, President—The instant appeals are arising out of the common order dated 04.09.2018 passed by the District Commission, Kangra, H.P. in consumer complaint No.32/2018 titled Mrs. Neeraj Sharma Vs. M/s Sant Auto Zone Private Limited & Ors.

Brief facts of the Case:

2. Briefly, case of the complainant is that complainant purchased a vehicle Mahindra KUV 1000 NXT K2 from opposite party No.1/dealer on 19.10.2017. The vehicle was financed from opposite party No.4/Financier. Temporary certificate of Registration (HP-68/Temp 5658), dated 19.10.2017 was issued by authorized signatory of opposite party No.1/dealer, which was valid for 30 days i.e. till 18.11.2017. After a week, the complainant found some problem in the vehicle and vehicle was taken to agency. The opposite party No.1/dealer instead of solving the problem, exchanged the said vehicle with a new one on 26.10.2017. The opposite party No.1/dealer while exchanging the aforesaid vehicle issued temporary registration certificate in which in the column of engine and chassis number fluid was used. The sale certificate dated 19.10.2017 was also issued. The opposite party No.1/dealer with malafide intention issued a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

INDER SINGH MEHTA, R. K. VERMAUnited India Insurance Company Ltd. – AppellantVersusNeeraj Sharma – Respondent

INDER SINGH MEHTA, R. K. VERMA
United India Insurance Company Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Neeraj Sharma – Respondent