SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DAYA CHAUDHARY, URVASHI AGNIHOTRI
Cholamandalam MS General Insurance Company Limited – Appellant
Versus
Uttam Singh – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant:Sh. J.P. Nahar, Advocate
For the Respondents: None

ORDER

Daya Chaudhary, President.—

Misc. Application No.984 of 2021 (Addl. Evidence)

The appellant/opposite party No.2 has filed the said application for placing on record the copy of the Insurance Policy along with its terms and conditions, Survey Report and letter dated 16.04.2019 as Annexures A-3 to A-5 by way of additional evidence.

The application is supported by an affidavit. These documents are stated to be necessary for disposal of the present case.

Heard.

For the reasons recorded in the application, the same is allowed as prayed and the said documents are taken on record.

Main Case

Appellant/Opposite Party No.2 i.e. Cholamandalam MS General Insurance Company Limited, 2nd Floor, ‘Dare House’ No.21, NSC Bose Road, Chennai-600001, India, through its Authorized Signatory, now through Vidhi Passi, Assistant Manager (Legal), Regional Office, SCO No.2463-2464, Sector 22-C, Chandigarh has filed the present appeal under Section 41 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 against the order dated 04.02.2021 passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Ferozepur (in short, “the District Commission”), whereby the complaint filed by respondent No.1/complainant was allowed aga

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top