SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

KUMKUM RANI, B. S. MANRAL
National Insurance Co. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Saumishra Mitra – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellant:Sh. Sudhanshu Dwivedi, Advocate
For the Respondent:Sh. Pankaj Joshi, Advocate

ORDER

Kumkum Rani, Judicial Member II—This appeal under Section 15 of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 has been directed against judgment and order dated 12.12.2018 passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Haridwar (hereinafter to be referred as the District Commission) in consumer complaint No. 317 of 2015 styled as Sh. Somitra Mishra vs. Manager, National Insurance Company Ltd., Haridwar, wherein and whereby the consumer complaint was allowed.

2. The facts giving rise to the appeal, in brief, are as such that the complainant purchased a vehicle ‘Sumo’ bearing registration No. UK08-TA-3340 in the month of February, 2012 which was insured vide policy No. 25331031116-320077826 for the sum insured of Rs. 5,45,343/- had valid from 07.02.2012 to 06.02.2013. The above vehicle was stolen in the intervening night of 19-20 of September, 2012; a FIR was lodged and a criminal case No. 711 of 2012 under Section 379 of IPC was registered. On account of non-traceability of the same the investigation officer had filed final report on dated 03.01.2013 which was accepted by the Court of C.J.M., Haridwar vide order dated 23.11.2013. A claim was submitted before the opposite party – in

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top