SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

RAJ SHEKHAR ATTRI, PREETINDER SINGH
Tata AIG General Insurance Co. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Hardeep Singh – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant:Sh. Sahil Abhi, Advocate
For the Respondent:Sh. Rajesh Verma, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Raj Shekhar Attri, President.—

M.A. No.164 of 2024 (Condonation of delay):-

Alongwith this appeal, this application has been filed by the applicant/appellant/opposite party for condonation of delay of 25 days (as per the office 18 days) in filing the same. Arguments of the parties on this application heard.

2. For the reasons stated in this application, we are of the considered view that the applicant/appellant has been able to satisfy that there had been a sufficient cause for not preferring the appeal within the stipulated period. In this view of the matter, this application stands allowed and the delay of 25 days (as per the office 18 days) in filing the appeal is condoned. Accordingly, this application stands dispose off.

Appeal No.75 of 2024:-

3. The appellant/opposite party has come up in this appeal assailing the order dated 08.11.2023, passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission-I, U.T., Chandigarh, whereby consumer complaint bearing no.10 of 2021 filed by the respondent/complainant was partly allowed against it as under:-

“...In view of the above discussion, the present consumer complaint succeeds and the same is accordingly partly allowed. OP i

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top