SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

INDER JIT SINGH
United India Insurance Company Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Belaben Harishkumar Gandhi – Respondent


Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Harsh Kumar, Advocate
For the Respondents:Mr. Mayur R Shah and Mr. Dhaneshwar Gudapalli, Advocates

ORDER

The present two Revision Petitions (RP) has been filed by the Petitioner against Respondent(s) as detailed above, under section 21(b) of Consumer Protection Act 1986, against the common order dated 14.02.2019 of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Ahemdabad, Gujarat (hereinafter referred to as the ‘State Commission’), in First Appeal (FA) No.524-525/2017 in which order dated 28.07.2017 of District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Ahemdabad (hereinafter referred to as District Forum) in Consumer Complaint (CC) CC/23/2014 & CC/24/2014 was challenged, inter alia praying to set aside the common order of State Commission and allow the revision petitions. As the above stated RPs have been filed against the similar/related orders of the State Commission, parties involved are the same, and issues for consideration/determination are related, these are being taken up together under this order. For the sake of convenience, parties would also be referred to as they were arrayed before the District Forum.

2. While the Revision Petitioner (hereinafter also referred to as OP) was Respondent and the Respondent(s) (hereinafter also referred to as Complainants) were Appellants

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top