SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

AVM J. RAJENDRA
Oriental Insurance Company Limited – Appellant
Versus
Md. Israil – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioners:Ms. Manish Pratap Singh, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. Pawan Kumar Ray, Advocate

ORDER

The present Revision Petition has been filed by the Petitioner under Section 21(b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (the “Act”) against impugned order dated 10.12.2012, passed by the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Jharkhand, (the ‘State Commission’) in First Appeal No. 237/2010. In this appeal, the Appeal of Petitioners/Opposite Parties (OPs) was allowed in part and reduced the compensation from Rs.1,00,000 to Rs.75,000. Vide the Order dated 04.06.2010, the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Dhanbad (the “District Forum”) in Consumer Complaint No. 308 of 2009 allowed the complaint filed by the Complainant/Respondent in part.

2. There was 21 days delay in filing the Revision Petition. Vide Order dated 12.02.2014, this Commission condoned the delay.

3. For the convenience, the parties are referred to as placed in the original Complaint filed before the District Forum.

4. Brief facts of the case, as per the Complainant, are that he is the owner of truck No. JH-10-F-6021. It was properly insured under Package Policy No. 2947 with the Opposite Parties (OPs) from 30.09.2007 to 29.09.2008. On 04.06.2008, the said truck was involved in a collision with ano

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top