SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

SUDIP AHLUWALIA
Neerja – Appellant
Versus
ATS Township Private Limited – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Complainant: In Person
For the Opp. Party:Mr. Kapil Kher, Advocate

ORDER

Sudip Ahluwalia, Member—This Consumer Complaint has been filed under Section 21(a)(i) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 alleging deficiency in service and unfair trade practice on the part of the Opposite Party, and seeking possession of the apartment, or in the alternative, refund of the deposited amounts along with ancillary reliefs.

2. The factual background in brief is that, in the year 2012, the Complainant became aware of a project by the Opposite Party known as “ATS One Hemlet,” located at Plot No. GH-01, Sector 104, Noida, Uttar Pradesh. The project boasted various amenities such as a luxurious clubhouse, swimming pool, tennis, squash, basketball courts, jogging track, gym, and shopping arcade. Subsequently, the Complainant booked Unit Reference No. 09064, with a super built-up area of 1636 Sq. Ft. in the project, and paid Rs. 5,00,000/- on 19.06.2012. The Opposite Party issued a Provisional Allotment Letter dated 13.07.2012, containing completely arbitrary and one-sided Terms & Conditions. Opting for the down payment plan, the Complainant made the entire payment of Rs. 97,78,212/-, except for Rs. 5,50,000/- which was to be paid at the time of possession. According

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top