SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(SC) 317

UDAY UMESH LALIT, PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA, S. RAVINDRA BHAT
Experion Developers Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Sushma Ashok Shiroor – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the parties :Jitendra chaudhary, Shilpa Chohan, pratyush nandan, Rajesh Singh, Gagan Gupta, Advocates

JUDGMENT :

PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA, J.

1. These appeals under Section 23 of the Consumer Protection Act, 19861 [hereinafter referred to as the “Act”] arise out of the judgment dated 19.06.2019 passed by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission2 [hereinafter referred to as “Commission”]. The Commission directed the Appellant-Developer to refund an amount of Rs. 2,06,41,379 with interest @ 9% p.a. to the Respondent- Consumer3 [hereinafter referred to as the “Consumer”] for its failure to deliver possession of the apartment within the time stipulated as per the Apartment Buyers Agreement. In these appeals, we have upheld the Commission’s order insofar as it directed the Developer to refund the amounts paid by the Consumer with interest for the unjustifiable delay in delivering the apartment. On law, we have considered the interplay between the judicial remedies under the Act and the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 and have explained the remedial choices of a consumer under these statutes. We have held that the Commission created under the Act has th


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top