SUBHASH CHANDRA, SADHNA SHANKER
Vaishali S. Mudkhedkar – Appellant
Versus
Pathak Constructions Builders & Promoters – Respondent
ORDER
Subhash Chandra, Presiding Member—This appeal under Section 19 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (in short, the ‘Act’) assails the order dated 17.03.2016 of the State Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission, Karnataka, Bangalore (in short, the ‘State Commission’) in Consumer Complaint no. 118 of 2013 pertaining to the construction of the apartment booked by the appellant with the respondent. The impugned order upheld the complaint and directed as below:—
“The complaint is hereby allowed with a cost of Rs 5000/-. The complainant as well as OP are hereby directed to approach Corporation Bank, Vontikoppal Branch, Temple Road, Mysore to obtain NOC for the purpose of execution of sale deed of flat no. S 4 apartment in “Pratham Pooja”. OP is further directed to execute sale deed in favour of complainant in respect of flat no. S 4 in “Pratham Pooja” within a period of three months from the date of this order within which time both the parties shall obtain NOC from Corporation Bank.
OP is further directed to pay interest @ 8% pa on amount of Rs 17,40,000/- from the date of complaint till execution of sale deed and handing over of possession to the complainant under proper acknowl
Kavita Ahuja vs Shipra Estate Ltd. and Jaikrishan Estate Developers Pvt. Ltd. and Ors.
Meerut Development Authority vs Mukesh Kumar Gupta IV (2012) CPJ 12. (Para 11)
Pioneer Urban Land & Infrastructure Ltd. vs. Govindan Raghavan
Fortune Infrastructure and Anr. vs. Trevor D’Lima and Ors. (2018) 5 SCC 442. (Para 12)
Ghaziabad Development Authority vs. Balbir Singh
Wg Cdr Arifur Rahman and Anr. vs. DLF Southern Homes and Anr
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.