SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

SUDIP AHLUWALIA, SADHNA SHANKER
Tejas Dutta – Appellant
Versus
Logix Heights Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Complainants: Aneesh Mittal with Ms. Sonia Abrol, Ms. Komai Mittal
For the Opp. Parties: Ms. Leena

ORDER

Sadhna Shanker, Member.—This complaint has been filed under Section 58(1)(a)(i) read with Section 35(1)(a) of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 by the flat owners/complainants/allottees seeking direction to the opposite parties to handover possession of their booked apartments, complete in all respects and in conformity with the allotment letter/specifications, with all additional facilities and as per quality standards promised and execute all necessary and required documents i.e. conveyance and registration of the flats in question in favour of the complainants after obtaining valid occupancy certificate and to pay interest at the rate of 9% per annum on the deposited amount from the stipulated date of possession i.e. 30.06.2018 till the date of actual possession is handed over along with compensation of Rs.75,000/- to each of the complainants for mental agony, harassment and discomfort and undue hardship and Rs.50,000/- to each complainants towards cost of litigation.

2. In view of the law laid down by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Brigade Enterprises Ltd. vs. Anil Kumar Vermani, Civil Appeal No.1779 of 2021, the instant complaint has been filed by seven complainants

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top