RAM SURAT RAM MAURYA, BHARATKUMAR PANDYA
Tariq Khusro – Appellant
Versus
Mohd. Ishratullah khan – Respondent
ORDER
Heard Mr. D. Devendra Rao, Advocate, for the complainant.
2. Tariq Khusro has filed above complaint, for directing the opposite parties to pay (i) Rs.97715000/- with interest @12% per annum, as the compensation; (ii) Rs.200000/- as litigation costs; and (iii) any other relief which is deemed fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.
3. The complainant stated that he was about 60 years old, employed at Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and working for one single company for the last 30 years and earning Rs.65/- lacs per annum. He was also into real estate business in India at Hyderabad and was earning Rs.30/- lacs approximately per annum. He grew by leaps and bounds. On account of his receding hairline and baldness, he was lured by the advertisements, bill boards and pamphlets relating to hair transplant, displayed by the opposite parties and consulted them. During consultations, Dr. Mohd. Ishratullah Khan and Dr. Taj Kazimi (OPs-1 and 2) informed that they had requisite qualification and taken extensive training in hair transplant in USA and in India and were permitted to practice by Medical Council of India; They were pioneer in this field. They stated that ha
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.