SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

MANOJIT MANDAL
Sandipan Sundar Santra – Appellant
Versus
Arun Kumar Das – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Abhisek Banerjee, Advocate

ORDER

Manojit Mandal, President—This revision petition under section 17(i)(b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (in short, ‘the Act’) has been filed against the order No. 22 dated 05.09.2023 passed by the Learned District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Howrah in connection with M.A. application being No. M.A./37/2018 arising out of complaint case No. CC/316/2017 whereby the Learned District Commission has been pleased to dismiss the prayer for setting aside the ex parte order and for accepting the written version filed by the revisionist / opposite party

No. 1.

2. The revisionist has made the following prayers:-

“To issue a Rule calling upon the Respondents herein to show cause as to why the impugned order being Order No. 22 dated 05.09.2023 passed by the Hon’ble District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Howrah in M.A. Case No. 37/2018 filed in CC/316/2017 be not set aside and / or quashed and upon hearing the parties, cause being shown and / or if no cause shown to make the Rule absolute and / or to pass such other further order / orders as Your Lordships may fit and proper.”

3. The only issue in this case relates to foreclosure of rights of the opposite party

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top