ORDER

Kumkum Rani, President—This revision petition under Section 17(1)(b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 has been directed against the impugned order dated 07.09.2018 passed by learned District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Nainital (hereinafter to be referred as “The District Commission”) in consumer complaint No. 04 of 2018, styled as Sh. Naveen Singh Bisht Vs. Branch Manager, ICICI Bank and another, wherein and whereby the adjournment application moved on behalf of the revisionist, who was opposite party No. 2 before the District Commission, was rejected and learned District Commission was pleased to proceed the consumer complaint ex-parte against the revisionist / opposite party No. 2.

2. The facts giving rise to the present revision petition are, as such, that consumer complaint No. 04 of 2018 was filed by respondent No. 1 – Sh. Naveen Singh Bisht before the District Commission, impleading Branch Manager, ICICI Bank and HDFC Bank Limited as the opposite parties to the consumer complaint and seeking compensation to the tune of Rs. 1,00,000/-; refund of Rs. 826/-, wrongly deducted from his account and Rs. 10,000/- as litigation expenses.

3. A perusal of the impugned