AVM J. RAJENDRA
Abdul Mannan S/o Late Abdul Majid – Appellant
Versus
Branch Manager, L. I. C. of India – Respondent
ORDER
The present Revision Petition has been filed by the Petitioner under Section 21(b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (the “Act”) against impugned order dated 21.04.2015, passed by the learned Jharkhand State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Ranchi, (‘the State Commission’) in First Appeal No. 24/2011 wherein the State Commission allowed the Appeal filed by the Respondent/OP against the order dated 07.12.2010 passed by the learned District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Dhanbad, (‘the District Forum’) wherein the District Forum had allowed the complaint filed by the Petitioner/Complainant.
2. For convenience, the parties are referred to as placed in the original Complaint filed before the District Forum.
3. Brief facts of the case, as per the Complainant, are that his wife took a policy on 8.11.2005 under ‘Jeevan Anand (With profits) (With Benefit) Accidental Policy for Rs. 5 Lakhs form LIC with the yearly premium of Rs.41,930/-. His wife suddenly fell ill and died on 19.11.2008 due to “Cardio Respiratory Failure.” He intimated the LIC and lodged his insurance claim but it was repudiated by dated 29.1.2010 against which he preferred appeal before the Zonal Office
Reliance Life Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. Rekhaben Nareshbhai Rathod
(1) Proposal form – In filling up the proposal form, the agent normally, ceases to act as agent of the insurer but becomes the agent of the insured and no agent can be assumed to have authority from ....
(1) Full Knowledge – DLA had the full knowledge of pre-existing ailments at the time of filling the proposal form and there was a nexus with preexisting disease and the cause(s) of death.(2) Proposal....
Contract of Insurance – A contract of insurance is one of utmost good faith. A proposer who seeks to obtain a policy of life insurance is duty bound to disclose all material facts bearing upon the is....
Revisional Jurisdiction – Revisional jurisdiction of the National Commission is extremely limited, it should be exercised only in case as contemplated within the parameters specified in the provision....
(1) Burden of proof – Insurance is a contract of utmost good faith, but the burden of proving that the insured suppressed material facts lies strictly on the Insurer. Exclusionary clauses and allegat....
(1) The “Three-Year Rule” (Section 45) – Under the amended Section 45, a policy cannot be questioned after three years from issuance or risk commencement on any ground.(2) Agent’s Responsibility – Th....
1) Per Sec. 45 of Insurance Act, claim can be repudiated, if it is proved that the assured knowingly and fraudulently suppressed the material facts.2) Contractual duty so imposed on the Insured is su....
The burden to prove misrepresentation or suppression of material facts in insurance contracts lies with the insurer, and claims cannot be repudiated without credible evidence.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.