AVM J. RAJENDRA
Jayashree Pattnaik – Appellant
Versus
TATA AIG Life Insurance Co. Ltd. – Respondent
ORDER
The present Revision Petitions have been filed by the Petitioner under Section 21(b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (‘the Act’) against impugned order dated 27.11.2020, passed by the learned State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Odisha, Cuttack, (‘the State Commission’) in First Appeal Nos. 443 and 540 of 2013 wherein the State Commission allowed the FA No.443 of 2013 filed by the Respondents/Opposite Parties (OP) and dismissed FA No.540 of 2013 filed by the Petitioner/Complainant against the order dated 22.08.2013 passed by the learned District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Cuttack (‘the District Forum’) wherein the District Forum had allowed the complaint filed by the Petitioner/ Complainant and directed the Respondents/OPs to pay Rs.45,000/- after deducting the payment, if any, made by the Opposite Parties as the medical expenses incurred by the Petitioner/Complainant at Narayan Hrudalaya, Bangalore and to pay a sum of Rs.5,000/- as compensation for mental and harassment and Rs.1000/- as litigation cost within two months from the date of receipt of the order.
2. There was two days delay in filing the Revision Petitions. For the reasons stated in IA/2220/
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.