SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

INDER JIT SINGH
Pravar Adhikshak (Senior Superintendent of Post Offices) – Appellant
Versus
Pinky Wadhwa – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr. B.K. Berera, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. Shubham Budhiraja, Advocate

ORDER

The present Revision Petition (RP) has been filed by the Petitioners against Respondent as detailed above, under section 21(b) of Consumer Protection Act 1986, against the order dated 21.05.2018 of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Rajasthan (hereinafter referred to as the ‘State Commission’), in First Appeal (FA) No. 21/2017 in which order dated 26.10.2016 of District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum-I, Moradabad (hereinafter referred to as District Forum) in Consumer Complaint (CC) No. 128/2015 was challenged, inter alia praying for setting aside the judgment and order dated 21.05.2018 passed by the State Commission in FA/21/2017 and the judgment dated 26.10.2016 passed by the District Forum in CC 128/2015.

2. While the Revision Petitioners (hereinafter also referred to as OPs) were Appellants before the State Commission and Opposite Parties before the District Forum and the Respondent (hereinafter also referred to as Complainant) was Respondent before the State Commission in FA/21/2017 and Complainant before the District Forum in Complaint No. 128/2015.

3. Notice was issued to the Respondent/Caveator on 26.04.2019. Parties filed Written Arguments on 24.01.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top