SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

SUBHASH CHANDRA, AVM J. RAJENDRA
Big Banyan Roots – Appellant
Versus
Manu Sharma – Respondent


Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant:Mr. Siddharth Vasudev, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. V.K. Goel, Advocate and Mr. Vipul Saluja, Advocates with Respondent in Person

ORDER

AVM J. Rajendra, AVSM, VSM (Retd.) Member—The present First Appeal has been filed under Section 19 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) against the Order dated 27.02.2018 passed by the Karnataka State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Bangalore (hereinafter to be referred as “the State Commission”), in Consumer Complaint No.146 of 2017, wherein the Complaint filed by the Complainant (Respondent herein) was partly allowed.

2. There was 13 days delay in filing of this First Appeal. For the reason stated in IA 8496/2018, the same is condoned.

3. For Convenience, the parties in the present case are being referred to as mentioned in the Complaint before State Commission.

4. Brief facts of the case, as per the Complainant, are that Mr. VK Ravindra and his family applied for land conversion and subsequently entered into a Joint Development Agreement (JDA) and General Power of Attorney (GPA) with Opposite Party (OP) on 30.08.2010. The OP intended to develop the property by constructing a housing complex named “RK Big Banyan Roots,” comprising multi-storied apartments, common entrances and other amenities.

5. The Complainant agreed to purch

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top