SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

B. SUDHEENDRA KUMAR, AJITH KUMAR D.
Manager IFFCO Tokio General Insurance Co. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Vellilathodi Mujeeb – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant:Prasanna Kumar Nair, Advocate

JUDGMENT

B. Sudheendra Kumar, President.—This appeal has been filed by the opposite parties challenging the order of the Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Malappuram (for short ‘the District Commission’) in C.C.No.109/2014.

2. The District Commission directed the 1st opposite party to pay Rs.3,26,628/- (Rupees Three Lakh Twenty Six Thousand Six Hundred and Twenty Eight only) to the complainant being the repair charge already paid by the complainant to the 2nd opposite party and to pay Rs.7,000/- (Rupees Seven Thousand only) as compensation and Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand only) as costs.

3. The complainant is the owner of the vehicle bearing registration No.KL 65 A 3999, which met with an accident on 02.06.2013 at Kottakkal. The accident occurred when the above said vehicle collided with another vehicle bearing registration No.KL 52B 7008. Both the vehicles sustained damage in the above accident. The complainant entrusted the car for the repair works with the 2nd opposite party and accordingly, the car was repaired. The complainant had to pay Rs.3,26,628/- (Rupees Three Lakhs Twenty Six Thousand Six Hundred and Twenty Eight only) as repairing charges. The complainant subm

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top