SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

A. P. SAHI, BHARATKUMAR PANDYA
Asst. Executive Engineer, KSEB – Appellant
Versus
P. Akbar Ali – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Ms. Raji Joseph, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. Deepak Prakash, Advocate

ORDER

A.P. Sahi, President.—This revision petition essentially raises a dispute about realization of electricity dues which the complainant alleges to be not maintainable, as the period for which the realization is sought, the complainant had not availed of any services of electricity supply nor was it rendered to or consumed by the complainant and therefore the stand of the electricity department was erroneous. The complaint CC/46/2008 was accordingly allowed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Mallapuram, Kerala. The Assistant Executive-Engineer filed an appeal no. 701 of 2009 against the order of the District Commission that has been dismissed, as a result whereof, the present revision has been filed by the appellant. The revision petition had been entertained and on 23.07.2012 it was adjourned with the passing of the following order:—

“In view of the nature of the dispute and direction dated 12.12.2011 of the Supreme Court in the case of U.P. Power Corporation Ltd. and Ors. v. Anis Ahmed, consideration of this petition is adjourned sine die with liberty to the parties to raise the matter if there is any further development in between.”

2. Since long the Ap

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top