SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

J. RAJENDRA, SUBHASH CHANDRA
Ram Pal – Appellant
Versus
Greater Mohali Area Development Authority – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Karan Kapoor, Advocate (VC)
For the Respondent:Ms. Zehra Khan, Advocate

ORDER

Subhash Chandra, Presiding Member—This Revision Petition under Section 21(b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (in short, “the Act”) challenges order dated 03.10.2017 of the Punjab State Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission, Chandigarh (in short, the “State Commission”) allowing Appeal No. 843 of 2016 against the order dated 12.09.2016 of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, SAS Nagar, Mohali (in short, “District Forum”) in Complaint Case No. 591 of 2015.

2. This order will also dispose Revision Petition No. 3338 of 2018 which is a cross petition filed by the respondent Development Authority against the same order of the State Commission (Appeal no. 843 of 2016 dated 03.10.2017) pertaining to the same set of facts. For the sake of convenience, RP 3489 of 2017 is taken as the lead case from which the facts are considered. In the interest of justice, and for the reasons mentioned in the IA seeking condonation of delay, the delay of 168 in the filing of RP 3338 of 2018 was condoned.

3. We have heard the learned counsel for the parties and given careful consideration to the material placed on record and the arguments urged before us.

4. The relevant facts of this ca

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top