R. K. AGRAWAL, S. M. KANTIKAR
Bathinda Development Authority – Appellant
Versus
Paramjit Kaur – Respondent
ORDER
R.K. Agrawal, President—Delay condoned.
2. This Revision Petition, under Section 21(b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (hereinafter referred to the Act), has been filed by Bathinda Development Authority (hereinafter referred to as BDA) and its Estate Officer, the Opposite Parties in the Complaint under the Act, against the order dated 14.03.2016, passed by the Punjab State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission at Chandigarh (hereinafter referred to as the State Commission) in First Appeal No. 137 of 2014. By the Impugned Order, while accepting the Appeal, preferred by the Petitioners herein, the State Commission has modified the Order dated 29.11.2013, passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Bathinda (hereinafter referred to as the District Commission) in Complaint Case No. 210 of 16.05.2013, preferred by the Complainant/Respondent herein. By the said Order, while accepting the Complaint, the District Commission had directed the Petitioners to jointly and severally refund the remaining deposited amount to the Complainant/Respondent against plots No. 234 and 235, after deducting 2% charges, along with interest @ 9% per annum on the amount of Rs.18,
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.