SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

J. RAJENDRA, ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA
Tilak Raj – Appellant
Versus
United India Insurance Co. Ltd. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Inderjeet Sharma, Advocate
For the Respondents:Ms. Nanita Thadani Sharma, Advocate

ORDER

Anoop Kumar Mendiratta, Member.—Revision petition preferred on behalf of the Petitioner I Complainant assails Order dated 18.09.2018 passed by learned State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Punjab (hereinafter referred to as the ‘State Commission’) in FA No. 275 of 2018, whereby the Order passed by the Ld. District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Patiala (hereinafter referred to as the ‘District Forum’) dismissing the complaint, filed by the complainant, was affirmed.

2. Petitioner and the Respondents are hereinafter referred to as the ‘Complainant and Opposite parties’ as appearing in the complaint preferred before the District Forum, for sake of convenience.

3. Factual matrix as noticed in the impugned Order may be briefly referred. Complainant is the registered owner of tractor Sonalika 60 HP model Di 2015, bearing registration No. PB-11-BR-3490, which was insured with the opposite party for the period 25.02.2016 to 24.02.2017. On 11.09.2016, tractor was driven by the father of the complainant, for taking delivery of trolley from village Dargapur. However, since it developed a technical snag on the way, father of the complainant proceeded to fetch a mechanic fo

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top