S. P. TAVADE, VIJAY C. PREMCHANDANI
Vijay Dashrath Naidu – Appellant
Versus
Wockhardt Hospitals Wani House – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Vijay C. Premchandani, Member.—
Facts of the Case:
This appeal arises out of a complaint filed by the complainant (father of the deceased patient) alleging gross medical negligence and deficiency in service by the respondent hospital and its doctors, leading to the untimely death of his son. The son was a young boy, who had been admitted to the respondent hospital on account of bleeding from nose. The son of appellant was hospitalized as on 15/04/2010 between 10 to 10.30 p.m. for treatment nose bleeding of Ravindra Vijay Naidu (herein after referred to as “patient”). During the period of 15/04/2010 to 16/04/201, the respondent no.2 to 5 carried out the check-ups and treatment of the patient. As on 16/04/2010 as about 3.00 a.m. the patient fell down while going to the bathroom and complained of the chest pain and uneasiness and since then gradually the condition of the patient became serious, however, concerned doctors did not pay any heed to his complaint and they did not give proper treatment immediately. Though the condition of the patient itself became serious, but till 7 a.m. of 16/04/2010 the patient was not admitted to ICU. Thereafter, on 16/04/2010 at about 7 a.m. th
Harjot Ahluwalia (Minor) vs. Spring Meadows Hospital and Anr.
(1) Medical negligence – Consent for admission in ICU is not a legal requirement for admission in Intensive Care Unit for a life-threatening condition – Medico-legal procedure or formalities should n....
(1) Medical Board Report - Looking to the Medical Board Report, entire record, Bed Head Ticket of the patient, Commission was of the view that, the patient was given proper care, timely and possible ....
Negligence - The patient was given the best possible treatment in accordance with accepted medical standards. It is indeed unfortunate that the patient could not be saved and the death was not on acc....
Medical Negligence – Doctor is not to be held negligent simply because a mishap occurred.
Medical negligence – Principle of Res Ipsa Loquitur get attracted where circumstances strongly suggest partaking in negligent behaviour by person against whom accusation of negligence is made.
(1) Non Supply of Medical Records – deficiency in service by the Opposite Parties is glaringly apparent with regard to non-supply of copies of the medical records, as sought for by the complainants.
“Since doctors made all efforts to resuscitate the patient from the cardiac arrest but could not revive the patient and since treating doctors performed their duty with reasonable standard of care, t....
(1) Pancreatitis – Pancreatitis could be detected only much later but OPs cannot be held responsible.(2) Negligence – The patient’s treatment was based on from OP No.3, which further underscores negl....
Medical knowledge - The complainant raised vague allegations on conjuncture only without having medical knowledge. He has not filed any expert opinion to prove the negligence of OPs.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.