SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

SUDIP AHLUWALIA, SADHNA SHANKER
Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Bharat Wahi – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant:Mr. Vishnu Kant, Advocate
For the Respondent: In Person

ORDER

Sudip Ahluwalia, Member.—This Appeal has been filed against the impugned Order dated 04.07.2019 in Consumer Complaint No. 448 of 2018, passed by the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, U.T., Chandigarh, vide which, the Complaint filed by the Respondent was partly allowed with the following directions -

“22. For the reasons recorded above, this complaint is partly accepted, with costs. Opposite parties no.1 to 3, jointly and severally, are directed as under: -

(i) To execute and get registered the sale deed, in respect of the unit, in question, in favour of the complainant, possession of which had already been delivered on 14.04.2019 during pendency of this complaint, within three months, from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order, on payment of registration and stamp duty charges, by him to the Registering Authorities.

(ii) To pay compensation, by way of interest @12% p.a., on the entire deposited amount, to the complainant, from 11.08.2015 (30 months from 12.02.2013, the date, by which 95% of the basic sale price stood received by opposite parties no.1 to 3) till 14.04.2019 (the date when possession delivered), within two months, from the date

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top