SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

RAJ SHEKHAR ATTRI, PREETINDER SINGH
Jagtar Singh – Appellant
Versus
Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant:Sh. Devinder Kumar, Advocate
For the Respondent:Sh. Arjun Sharma, Advocate

ORDER

Raj Shekhar Attri, President.—The complainant (appellant in this appeal) by way of filing this appeal is seeking modification of the relief already awarded to him, vide order dated 21.08.2025 passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission-II, U.T., Chandigarh (in short the District Commission), in consumer complaint bearing no.698 of 2020. Following relief has already been granted by the District Commission while allowing the said consumer complaint:—

“...12] In view of the above discussion, the complaint of the complainant is partly allowed and the opposite party is directed as under:—

i) To pay Rs.4,24,925/- to the complainant (i.e. compensation @ Rs.10/- per sq.ft. per month for the super area 1725 sq.ft i.e. Rs.17250/- per month for the delayed period of 24 months 19 days with effect from 30.12.2014 to 18.01.2017).

ii) To pay Rs.10,000/- to the complainant as compensation for the harassment caused as well as litigation expenses.

The above said order shall be complied with by the opposite party within a period of 45 days from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.

13] The pending application(s) if any, stands disposed of accordingly...

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top