SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

MEENA RAMANATHAN, K. RANGA RAO
P. L. V. Prasad – Appellant
Versus
Sai Jitesh Constructions (P) Ltd. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Complainant: M/s V. Gourisankar Rao
For the Opp. Parties: Mr. M. Hari Babu

JUDGMENT

Meena Ramanathan, Member (Non-Judicial)—This is a complaint filed by the complainant U/s.17(1)(a)(i) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 praying this Commission to direct the Opposite Parties:—

(i) to pay Rs.7,25,000/- for loss of rent from 14th August 2014 to till March 2016 @ Rs.36,250/- per month;

(ii) to pay Rs.10,00,000/- for not obtaining Occupancy Certificate;

(iii) to reimburse Rs.8,00,000/- together with interest @ 24% from December 2015 incurred by the complainant for competing the internal pending works;

(iv) to reimburse shortage of Sq. ft of the officer space amount @ Rs.2,000/- per sq. ft.

(v) to demarcate and allot car parking area to the complainant;

(vi) to remove the room in front of complainant officer space and to construct common toilets as per Sale Deed plan;

(vii) to remove unauthorized constructions in cellar car parking area;

(viii) to provide adequate (300 kV) capacity electricity transformer;

(ix) to provide 10 member full capacity lift;

(x) to provide drinking water connections from HMWS & SB.

(xi) to install power Generator;

(xii) to complete paintings of the building;

(xiii) to pay compensation of Rs.20,00,000/- towar

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top