SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

POONAM V. MAHARSHI, NISHA AMOL CHAVHAN
Savio Alva – Appellant
Versus
Ravi Developments A Partnership Firm – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Complainant:Sajira Jondhale, Advocate
For the Opp. Parties No.1:Prasad C. Apte, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Dr. Nisha Amol Chavhan, Member.—The present Consumer Complaint No.CC/62/2016 is filed under S. 17(1)(a)(i) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986. (The ‘C.P. Act’ for short) by the complainant against opposite parties.

2. The complainant alleged deficiency in service and unfair trade practice in relation to non-completion of construction, non- obtaining the occupation certificate and failure to deliver possession of Flat. The reliefs sought include possession with occupancy certificate of Flat No.1103 on the 11th floor, in A-Wing in the Building known as “Gaurav Saffron”, located at Ghodbunder, Mira Road (East), Thane after receiving the balance consideration of the Flat as per the terms of Agreement for Sale dated 31/05/2011 or in the alternative an equivalent flat in the same vicinity, together with compensation for delay, rent reimbursement, and litigation costs or in alternate Opposite Party No.1 to pay to the Complainants the proportionate Current Market Value as on the date of passing of the final Order/disposal of the above numbered Complaint as per the Stamp Duty Ready Reckoner’s Rate. (As per Stamp Dirty Ready Reckoner, 2015 the value of the flat is Rs.28,00,022/- or

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top