P.N.BHAGWATI, P.D.DESAI, B.J.DIVAN
SHIVPRASAD UMASHANKER – Appellant
Versus
MUNICIPALITY OF PALITANA – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS Letters Patent Appeal raises an interesting question affecting the relationship of a Municipality and its Chief Officer under the provisions of the Gujarat Municipalities Act, 1963. The facts giving rise to the appeal are few and may be briefly stated as follows. Prior to the coming into force of the Gujarat Municipalities Act, 1963, Palitana Municipality was governed by the Bombay District Municipal Act, 1901. The petitioner was appointed Chief Officer of the Palitana Municipality in January 1959 and this appointment was approved by the Collector by an order, dated 20th February 1965. Though in the appointment the petitioner was designated as Chief Officer, there was no statutory office of Chief officer under the Bombay District Municipal Act, 1901. It was only under the Gujarat municipalities Act, 1963, that a statutory office of Chief Officer was created for the first time. Palitana Municipality, therefore, on the coming into force of the gujarat Municipalities Act, 1963, passed a resolution, dated 22nd April 1965 appointing the petitioner as Chief Officer under Sec. 47 of the Act. The pay-scale of the Chief Officer was thereafter revised by Palitana
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.