SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Guj) 280

C.K.BUCH
BIPIN SHANTILAL PANCHAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: A.D.SHAH, B.B.NAIK, D.N.Patel, N.D.GOHIL

C. K. BUCH, J.

( 1 ) RULE. Service of Rule is waived by ld. APP Mr. N. D. Gohil for Respondent No. 1 State and ld. Spl. P. P. Mr. D. N. Patel for Respondent No. 2 Director of Revenue Intelligence (DRI for short) in both these applications.

( 2 ) BOTH these Cri. Misc. Applications are preferred under sec. 439 of Crpc praying bail by the petitioners-accused of Sessions Case No. 162/94 pending in the Court of ld. Additional City Sessions Judge, Ahmedabad. Since in both the applications similar points are involved, they are heard and disposed of by this common order.

( 3 ) THE petitioners of both these application i. e. Cri. Misc. Application No. 6523/2000 and 1722/2001 are facing trial of the offences punishable under sections 22 and 24 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act,1985 read with section 120b of IPC and section 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act,1985. (hereinafter referred to as the "ndps Act" ). Both these petitioners had prayed earlier for bail pending trial on more than one occasions before this Court and before the Sessions Court. Sessions Case No. 162/94 pending in the Court of ld. Addl. City Sessions Judge, Ahmedabad, is a commenced



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top