SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Guj) 347

D.M.DHARMADHIKARI, K.R.VYAS
JAYMAL THAKORE – Appellant
Versus
CHARITY COMMISSIONER,gujarat STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: A.R.GUPTA, G.M.JOSHI, GIRISH D.BHATT, K.A.PUJ, S.N.Soparkar

D. M. DHARMADHIKARI, J.

( 1 ) ). The petitioner is a Chartered Accountant and in his professional capacity claims a right to represent his clients both as "recognised agent" and a "pleader" under a duly executed power of Attorney in his favour in proceedings before the Charity Commissioner under Sec. 50a of the Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) which admittedly is applicable to the State of Gujarat.

( 2 ) THIS case was to be heard and decided by the learned single Judge, but finding that the question involved is of some general importance, it has been referred for decision by the Division Bench.

( 3 ) IN exercise of powers under Sec. 50a of the Act, the Charity Commissioner is empowered to frame and settle a scheme of management of a public trust after giving opportunity of hearing to the trustees and by public notice to the beneficiaries. Under sub-sec. (4) of Sec. 50a, after hearing the parties and recording evidence, a scheme framed and settled for management of the trust by the Charity Commissioner is said to have effect as a "decree" of a Court passed under Sec. 50, when the Civil Court is approached for preparing such a scheme of management in




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top