SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Guj) 71

D.S.SINHA, J.M.PANCHAL
RAMANBHAI B. PATEL – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: PREMAL R.JOSHI, S.B.VAKIL

J. M. PANCHAL, J.

( 1 ) BY filing instant appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent, the five appellants claim that the order and judgement dated December 30, 1999 passed by the learned Single Judge in Special Civil Application NO. 1939/88 remanding the matter to the Gujarat Revenue Tribunal for deciding two questions, namely, whether the word "person" as defined in Gujarat Agricultural Lands Ceiling Act, 1960 (the Ceiling Act for short) includes "association of persons", and whether in absence of an application under section 8 of the Ceiling Act, the appellants are entitled to different units, as well as the decision dated February 23, 2000 rendered by the learned Single Judge in Misc. Civil Application No. 208/2000 rejecting the prayer made by the appellants to review the judgement delivered in Special Civil Application No. 1939/88, being illegal should be set aside.

( 2 ) THE relevant facts may be noticed in brief. 2. 1 on September 15, 1969 an agreement was entered into between the appellants and their spouses for purchase and cultivation of agricultural lands. It was provided therein that the division/partition of the lands to be purchased should be effected as early as poss













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top