SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Guj) 364

K.A.PUJ
BHAVESH M. TALSANIA – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: B.P.TANNA, G.M.JOSHI, Mita S.Panchal, S.N.SHELAT, Shruti D.Trivedi

K. A. PUJ, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioners have filed this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking direction against the respondent authorities directing them to take separate interviews for minor batch of 1996 for seats equivalent to 1/3rd number of seats allotted to major batch of 1996. The petitioners have further sought directions against the respondent authorities to evolve a transparent system of interview where a candidate moves in advance and knows minute by minute the position of vacancies in various subjects. By way of an amendment to the petition, the petitioners have further sought a declaration to the effect that Rules 3. 1 and 4. 8 of the Rules governing admission to Post Graduate Degree and Diploma Medical Courses framed by the Gujarat University, the respondent No. 3 herein, as ultra vires the Article 14 of the Constitution of India.

( 2 ) THE brief facts, giving rise to the present petition, are that the petitioners are students of old course of MBBS and they have passed their HSC Examination in the month of June 1996. Due to various litigations pending in this Court, in respect of conflict between premedical students and standard 12th students and




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top