SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Guj) 370

C.K.BUCH
P. K. ROSHAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: K.J.SETHNA, K.T.DAVE, M.M.TIRMIZI

( 1 ) ). THE present Cri. Revision Application is preferred under Section 397 R/w 401 of Crpc against the order passed by ld. Judicial Magistrate (F. C.), (Court No. 3), Surat in Criminal Case No. 4/2002 dated 11. 07. 2002. Vide order under challenge, ld. JMFC, after inquiry conducted under sec. 202 Crpc, issued process against the petitioners for the offences punishable under sections 323, 504, 506 (1) and 294 (b) of Indian Penal Code. Respondent No. 2 Rajendrasingh Madansingh Chauhan is the complainant of Criminal Case No. 4/2002 (hereinafter after referred to as the complainant for convenience ). The complaint against the present petitioner along with three other accused persons came to be filed by the complainant on 13. 03. 2002 alleging that the petitioner and other accused named in the complaint (Annex. A P. 15) committed alleged offence on 03. 03. 2002 when the complainant was at his residence with his family during the communal riots and public disturbance that had taken place in different areas of city of Surat. It is alleged that the complainant and his two sons Himanshu and Jignesh are Advocates by profession and the petitioner at the relevant point of time was Deputy Co












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top