SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(Guj) 422

2009(1) GCD 429(Guj)(DB)
Hon’ble Mr. Chief Justice Mr. K.S. Radhakrishnan &
Honourable Mr. Justice Akil Kureshi
Regional Passport Officer
Versus
Kokilaben wife of Jaswantlal Panchal & Ors.
Letters Patent Appeal No. 1673 of 20061—2Decided on 05/12/20083

Advocates:
Appearance :
Mr. Harin Raval, Sr. Counsel with Mr. Y.N. Ravani, for the Appellant No. 1.
Mr. Murali N. Devnani and Mr. Chetan K. Pandya, for the Respondents.

Whether Direction by Single Judge to Competent Passport Authority of holding independent inquiry to effect change in date of birth, place of birth or name in passport is validly made?

Headnote:Head Note :

       Passports Act, 1967 — Sections 5, 51-B, 5(2), 10, Part I Schedule III — Passports Rules, 1980 — Rule 5, Proviso thereto — Passport Manual, 2001 — Paragraph 8-1 & 8-3 — Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969 — Sections 13, 13(1) to(3), 15 — Gujarat Registration of Births and Deaths Rules, 2004 — Rule 11 — Gujarat Secondary Education Act, 1972 — Gujarat Secondary Education Regulation, 1974 — Regulations 12(A), 12(5)(1), 5(1)(A) to(D), 12(6) — Date of birth, Place of birth or name — Change/amendment in passports — Direction to Competent Passport Authority of holding enquiry — Sustainability — Finding as to — Law is very clear on the subject that Passport Authorities are not competent and are also not expected to make their own independent enquiry with regard to the date of birth, place of birth or name entered in passport especially when entries were once made on the record already produced by the passport holder — If there is any mistake made then it is for the party who seeks correction to produce documents before concerned statutory authorities, Judicial Magistrate or the civil Court based on which correction can be ordered in passport already issued — It is not the function of the Passport Authority functioning under the Passport Act and Rules and Regulations to hold inquiry in that regard — Court disagreeing with the reasoning of impugned ruling rendered by Ld. Judge that Passport Authorities are required to conduct it’s own independent inquiry to decide correction sought — Set aside the same.

       Held :

       Court is, clearly of the view that Passport Authorities are not expected to make their own independent enquiry when there is a dispute or difference with regard to the date of birth, place of birth or name entered in the Passport, especially when entries were once made on the basis of records produced by the Passport holder. If there is any mistake on the records already produced, based on which entries were already made, then it is for the party who seeks correction to produce documents after carrying out necessary correction by the concerned statutory authorities, Judicial Magistrate or the Civil Court, as the case may be. Passport Authorities are always competent to direct the parties to produce relevant documents either from the authorities functioning under the Births and Deaths Register or from the Judicial Magistrate or from the Civil Court, as the case may be. On production of corrected documents, Passport Authorities will immediately carry out necessary correction in the Passport. [Para 12]

       Court has already indicated that Sub-section(2) of Section 5 of the Act enables the Passport authority to ask for furnishing such additional information, documents or certificates, as may be considered necessary by such authority for the proper disposal of the application. Therefore, it is always open to the Passport authority to insist that, when application is submitted by any person for correction of date of birth, place of birth or name, to produce relevant certificates issued by the Competent statutory authority, Judicial Magistrate or Civil Court, based on which necessary correction could be made in the Passport already issued. Passport Authority is not competent or expected to make a rowing enquiry by its own to decide as to whether date of birth, place of birth or name already entered in the Passport is correct or not, which in our view, is not the function of the Passport Authority functioning under the Passport Act and the Rules and Regulations. Court, disagree with the reasoning of the ruling rendered by the Judge as well as the view expressed by the Division Bench of the Bombay High Court. [Para 14]

       Law Laid Down :

       Passport Authority is not competent or expected to make an enquiry to decide as to whether date of birth, place of birth or name already entered in the passport is correct or not.

       

Judgment

K.S. Radhakrishnan, CJ.—The Regional Passport Officer, Ahmedabad, aggrieved by certain directions and observations made by the learned Single Judge in Special Civil Application No. 2716 of 2006 and connected matters, reported in 2006(2) GLR 1165, has come up with these appeals - Letters Patent Appeal Nos. 1673 of 2006 and connected matters. Letters Patent Appeal No. 100 of 2008 and connected matters have also been filed by the same Officer, aggrieved by the directions issued by another learned Single Judge in Special Civil Application No. 3907 of 2006 and connected matters(reported in 2006(2) GLR 1208), seeking some modifications.

2. The issue involved in all these cases is either with regard to the correction of date of birth, place of birth or name entered in various Passports issued to the parties. Learned Single Judges, after referring to the instructions issued by the Ministry of External Affairs vide No. VI/401/2/5/2001 dated 18.4.2001, Division Bench judgment of the Bombay High Court in Jigar Harish Shah vs. Union of India and Anr., AIR 2001 Bombay 60 and also another decision of this Court in Prashant Vinodbhai Acharya vs. Regional Passport Officer, 2004(1) GLR 212, disposed of all the petitions, permitting petitioners to move appropriate application for correction/amendment and change of date of birth, place of birth or name, as the case may be, and the competent Passport Authority was directed to consider the same after holding necessary enquiry and to pass appropriate orders in accordance with law, and on merits in the light of the observations made by the learned Single Judge. It was also ordered that the Passport Authority, henceforth in future case, shall not straightaway refuse to entertain application, or decline to accept the application for correction without holding any enquiry, and shall not, without holding necessary enquiry call upon the applicant to obtain appropriate orders from the Court.

3. Passport Authority is seriously aggrieved by the above directions issued by the learned Single Judge. It was stated that learned Single Judge has completely mis-interpreted instructions issued by the Ministry of External Affairs, Government of India, and has also committed an error in directing the Passport Authority to effect changes and enter details in the Passport after holding enquiry, without referring it to the Competent Authority or to the Civil Court. Further, it was also pointed out that learned Single Judge has committed serious error in not noticing that there is no mechanism available under the Passport Act to decide the correctness or otherwise of the date of birth, place of birth and name already entered in the Passport, on the basis of the documents initially produced by the parties. Further, it was also stated that when there is difference in date of birth entered in the birth certificate issued by the Authority under the Births and Deaths Registration Act, 1961 and the School Leaving Certificate issued by the competent school authority, such a discrepancy cannot be resolved by the Passport Authority, but it can be decided only by the competent Civil Court. It was also pointed out that the certificate issued by the Competent Authority under the Births and Deaths Registration Act is having over-riding effect over the entry made in the school leaving certificate and when there is difference in date of birth and name in two certificates issued by two Competent Authorities, the Passport Authority should not have been directed to make an enquiry and decide which certificate has to be accepted. It was also submitted that Passport Rule provides only amendment to the extent of correction of genuine error or mistake and it does not prescribe change of details, if the applicant himself has chosen to fill in the form with incorrect particulars in respect of place of birth, date of birth etc. on the basis of school leaving certificate or any other documents issued by the local authority, and when it is c




































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top